Chateau Labégorce 1967 vs. Chateau Latour 1967

November 23, 2011
by Christian
in What I Drank Last Night
with 1 Comment

Still possessing a glimmer of life.

Over lunch yesterday, some old Bordeaux. Unclassed Margaux property Labégorce up against Pauillac First Growth Latour, both from the 1967 vintage to be precise. Labégorce was a wine geek oddity, past its best but still of interest. Boot polish and forest floor aromas on the nose, before a palate that showed the last vestiges of red fruit, plenty of tertiary character and rather hard acidity.

The Latour, meanwhile, proved that the famous 1855 Classification was not entirely spurious. Deep colour, intense cassis on both nose and palate, tannins firm but ever so fine. What more could could be asked of the wine? I believe 1961 was quite a good vintage…

Tagged ,

Share this post

One Comment

  1. Shane GordonNovember 23, 2011 at 3:25 pmReply

    Hi Christian

    1967 does not seem to be recorded as a good red wine vintage but it is noted as a good vintage for sweet Bordeaux wines. 1961 is recorded as a good vintage for red wines however.
    Regards

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

SHOP ONLINE
winemag-storm
ADVERTISING
ADVERTISING
HOT AND HAPPENING
AEC v1.0.4
  • No upcoming events
AEC v1.0.4
ADVERTISING
newlstter2 Get the biggest stories of the past fortnight sent directly to your inbox. subscribe
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
ADVERTISING
BE SAFE

Wine magazine was published from October 1993 until September 2011 & now lives on in digital form as Winemag.co.za. We cover everything to do with SA fine wine.

XSLT Plugin by Leo Jiang