Chateau Pichon Longueville Comtesse de Lalande 1996 vs Kanonkop CWG 1997

Heavyweight bout.

Heavyweight bout.

Don’t bring a knife to a gun fight, as the saying goes, and so when I suggested to Keith Prothero, former investor in Mullineux Family Wines and all-round wine enthusiast, that I would bring a bottle of Kanonkop CWG 1997 to lunch, he countered with Pauillac Second Growth Pichon Longueville Comtesse de Lalande 1996.

Both bottles were in excellent nick I’m happy to report, tasting notes and scores as follows:

Chateau Pichon Longueville Comtesse de Lalande 1996 average price: R2 978 a bottle

Red and black fruit, violets and truffle. Really elegant and composed on the palate – weightless intensity, bright acidity and fine tannins. Super length – savoury but not overly so. Perhaps the first signs of some forest floor but set to drink well many years to come.

Score: 94/100.

Kanonkop CWG 1997
Not available for purchase.

Black berries, some leafiness and attractive oak spice. Sweeter fruit and more heft than the Pichon (14% abv compared to the above’s 13%). If contrast to forest floor as a result of maturation, this had the first signs of tomato cocktail. Perhaps slightly less detail but very little to choose between the two.

Score: 93/100.

Tagged , , ,

Share this post

One Comment

  1. keith protheroApril 28, 2015 at 5:39 pmReply

    Good notes which fairly reflect my view of the wines. Considering that the Pichon is very highly rated and close to being the wine of the vintage,the Kanonkop showed very well and was by no means outshone.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


AEC v1.0.4
  • No upcoming events
AEC v1.0.4
newlstter2 Get the biggest stories of the past fortnight sent directly to your inbox. subscribe

Wine magazine was published from October 1993 until September 2011 & now lives on in digital form as We cover everything to do with SA fine wine.

XSLT Plugin by Leo Jiang