Chateau Pontet-Canet 2010

September 26, 2013
by Christian
in What I Drank Last Night
with 6 Comments

Perfection?

Perfection?

Last night, a tasting of Bordeaux from the much vaunted 2010 vintage hosted by Wine Cellar, the Cape Town-based fine wine merchants and cellarers.

Two remarkable wines, the first being newly appointed St-Emilion First Growth Château Angélus, the 2010 rated 98 on the 100-point scale by the influential US critic Robert Parker. With an alcohol by volume of 15.5%, it’s incredibly rich and dense but is in no way listless or hot – the fruit pure and well defined, the acidity fresh. Yours for just R4 150 a bottle from Wine Cellar.

Then, the Pontet-Canet, the Pauillac Fifth Growth, the 2010 rated 100 out of 100 by Parker. Dark fruit, some floral character, some attractive herbaceousness, a subtle maritime note. Sweet-fruited upfront b but balanced by fresh acidity and possessing lovely structure, the tannins firm but fine – a very composed wine. Very difficult to fault so why not give it a perfect score? R3 250 a bottle from Wine Cellar.

For the full list of Bordeaux 2010s available from Wine Cellar, see here.

Tagged , , , , ,

Share this post

6 Comments

  1. JoeSeptember 26, 2013 at 3:44 pmReply

    Much, much easier rating system: Wines I’ll drink (&keep to myself while drinking), wines I’ll drink (&share while drinking), wines I’ll pour my mother-in-law.

  2. KwispedoorSeptember 26, 2013 at 10:56 amReply

    Ha-ha – all scores are academic (and other things aside), which is the only reason I was curious. But then they needed to have been 100-point scores to be compared with Parky’s.

    • ChristianSeptember 26, 2013 at 11:28 amReplyAuthor

      I concede that scoring/rating wine is untenable after a point but do it anyway as a guide to purchase. What I meant in this instance is that whatever I give Angelus 2010 or Pontet-Canet 2010 is going to have absolutely no influence on the market whatsoever whereas giving Luddite Chenin Blanc 2012, for instance, a score of 91 might result in at least one or two bottles getting sold.

      • KwispedoorSeptember 26, 2013 at 11:54 am

        I get all of that. And you’re right (eish, but that Luddite price prohibits most Luddites from trying it out…). I was simply a touch interested to see how close to 100 you’ll go, especially as I personally think the 100-point system is even more daft than the 20-point system, though they both clearly have some (mostly commercial) value and scoring is certainly not without merit if you blog about wine. Alas, you’ve side-stepped that one like Carel du Plessis… ;-)

  3. ChristianSeptember 26, 2013 at 10:28 amReplyAuthor

    Hi Kwispedoor, Kinda academic but reverting to the 20-point system, I scored Angelus 18 and the Pontet Canet 18+.

  4. KwispedoorSeptember 26, 2013 at 10:10 amReply

    Hi, Christian – what did you score those two?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

ADVERTISING
SHOP ONLINE
winemag-storm
HOT AND HAPPENING
AEC v1.0.4
  • No upcoming events
AEC v1.0.4
ADVERTISING
newlstter2 Get the biggest stories of the past fortnight sent directly to your inbox. subscribe
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
ADVERTISING
BE SAFE

Wine magazine was published from October 1993 until September 2011 & now lives on in digital form as Winemag.co.za. We cover everything to do with SA fine wine.

XSLT Plugin by Leo Jiang