How does Morgenster stack up against Bordeaux?

April 16, 2015
by Christian Eedes
in Opinion & Analysis
with 3 Comments
Who's who in the zoo?

Who’s who in the zoo?

At the launch of the Morgenster 2011 yesterday, six wines tasted blind by a gathering of some 50 people from the wine trade and media.
Here’s how I ranked them:

1. Chateau Leoville Poyferre 2002 – Second Growth, St Julien
Average price: R984
Red and black fruit plus a slight maritime quality. Lovely fruit purity, freshness and structure.
Score: 94/100.

2. Chateau Leoville- Barton 2004 – Second Growth, St Julien
Average price: R1 002
Dark fruit, a floral top note plus also a slight meatiness. Great intensity, fresh acidity and firm tannins.
Score: 93/100. (During discussion, it was pointed out that this wine is Brett contaminated which I concede and my score is therefore probably too high but it’s hardly undrinkable).

3. Chateau Prieure-Lichine 2001 – Fourth Growth, Margaux
Average price: R603
Black fruit, hint of forest floor. Plenty of power – sweet fruited with lovely tannic grip.
Score: 92/100.

4. Morgenster 2004
Not currently available.
Red fruit, some tomato cocktail and a little herbal fragrance. Medium bodied with good freshness and fine tannins. Starting to fade?
Score: 89/100.

5. Morgenster 2001
Price: R409.50
Very developed – red and black fruit but also tomato cocktail, meat stock, forest floor and earth. Past best but still appealing.
Score: 88/100.

6. Morgenster 2003
Price: R409.50
Red fruit plus a pronounced herbal character on the nose and palate. Medium bodied with fresh acidity and fine tannins. Very “green” in the context of the flight.
Score: 87/100.

The group ranking was as follows:
1. Morgenster 2004
2. Chateau Leoville Barton 2004
3. Chateau Leoville Poyferre 2002
4. Morgenster 2003
5. Chateau Prieure-Lichine 2001
6. Morgenster 2001

A general observation: Cab-based wines generally considered the best in this country often look exceptionally “green” when put up against their counterparts from elsewhere in the world. Are South African wine professionals too tolerant of pyrazine-derived aromas and flavours? Are we doing enough to eradicate leaf-roll virus? Do local growing conditions simply entail that Cab doesn’t ripen properly?

Tagged , , , , , ,

Share this post


  1. Mark EdwardMay 13, 2015 at 7:28 pmReply

    Thanks for the article. Is the final ranking a price adjusted one, or did the domestic palate just prefer the Cape expression?

    • Christian EedesMay 14, 2015 at 9:54 amReplyAuthor

      Hi Mark, The wines were tasted blind so I think what was most at play is a preference for the familiar…

  2. Mike RatcliffeApril 21, 2015 at 11:20 pmReply

    Interesting. The much used ‘perception of green’ comment. If a vine doesn’t ripen, especially with Cabernet, it will be green. Unripe and herbaceous are not the same. Perception implies that some people may see it and some may not. Green in Cabernet, to higher-end consumers at least, is a fault.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


AEC v1.0.4
  • October 25, 2016Veritas Tasting - JHB
  • October 26, 2016RMB WineX 2016
  • October 29, 2016Season of Sauvignon Festival
  • November 1, 2016Prescient Chardonnay Public Tasting - Café Cru, Monte Casino
AEC v1.0.4
newlstter2 Get the biggest stories of the past fortnight sent directly to your inbox. subscribe

Wine magazine was published from October 1993 until September 2011 & now lives on in digital form as We cover everything to do with South African wine.

XSLT Plugin by Leo Jiang