Kanonkop Paul Sauer 2009 vs. 2010

November 7, 2013
by Christian
in What I Drank Last Night
with 9 Comments

What a difference a year makes.

What a difference a year makes.

Earlier this year, Kanonkop became the first winery in the world to win best blended red wine for the fourth time at the prestigious International Wine & Spirit Competition with the 2009 vintage of Paul Sauer – a wine I was responsible for rating only 4 Stars in Platter’s 2013 (shows what I know).

Last night, the 2009 next to the 2010, which I nominated for 5 Stars in the soon-to-be-released 2014 edition of Platter’s proved a fascinating contrast. Of course, 2009 has been deemed an exceptionally good vintage and 2010 quite the reverse – a heatwave shortly before harvest causing Stellenbosch vineyards to stress .

The 2009 features 69% Cabernet Sauvignon, 19% Merlot and 12% Cabernet Franc, the 2010 68% Cabernet Sauvignon, 16% Cabernet Franc and 16% Merlot (currently available at R370 a bottle).

The 2009 is more classic (or old-fashioned depending on your stand-point on stylistics) with an alcohol by volume of 14% compared to 14.5% for the 2010. Both are very definitely Paul Sauer with red and black fruit but the 2009 has a herbal top-note and much more grippy tannins (dare I say the “greener” of the two?) while the 2010 is more plush and the tannins are softer. Interestingly enough, the 2010 has the lower pH of the two at 3.49 compared to 3.61 for the 2009.

Looking at them side by side, I’m inclined to think I under-rated the 2009 and over-rated the 2010 – both are 4½ Star wines.

Tagged , , ,

Share this post


  1. PaulMarch 22, 2015 at 10:22 amReply

    Hi Christian,
    Not sure if you will pick up comments on old entries, but I was also unimpressed by the 2009 Paul Sauer when tasted on release. My thoughts were it was suffering from bottle shock or some similar malady and hence bought 3 bottles anyway. Glad to hear you now see the expected improvement, after all how bad can Paul Sauer from the 2009 vintage be?

  2. ChristianDecember 2, 2013 at 6:39 amReplyAuthor

    Hi Ruben,

    Both wines are built to go the distance and I think it really depends on your stylistic preference, the Vergelegen being Bordeaux style and the Columella Shiraz based. It bears mentioning that the 2010 vintage of Columella was one of my top 12 wines of the year in 2012.

    • RubãoDecember 2, 2013 at 9:04 pmReply

      Thank you once again!

  3. RubãoNovember 19, 2013 at 8:42 pmReply

    Hi, Christian.

    Would you help me with something?

    1) A friend of mine will be in Johannesburg next month. What wine stores would you recommend, both in terms of variety and good price?

    2) If you take Eben Sadie Columella, Kanonkop Paul Sauer, Vergelegen “G.V.B.” (the flagship red blend), Thelema Cabernet Sauvignon, Boekenhotskloof Syrah and AA Badenhorst Red Blend,
    a) Which wine is your absolute favorite?
    b) Which one do you think has the best quality-price ratio?
    c) Which one has the best maturation potential?

    3) How long would I have to wait in order to have a more evolved (but not necessarily at peak) Columella from the 2009 or 2010 vintage?

    Thank you,

    • ChristianNovember 20, 2013 at 10:45 amReplyAuthor

      Hi Ruben,

      1). The reputation of Norman Goodfellows precedes it while my good mate Corlien Morris recently opened a branch of Wine Concepts at Blu Bird Centre, corner of Atholl-Oaklands Road and Park Road, Birnam.

      2). Choosing a favourite from the list provided is just about impossible. In terms of value and maturation potential, I’d go with Kanonkop Paul Sauer.

      3) I’d say approximately five years from vintage and your Columella will be past its first flush of youth.

      • RubãoNovember 28, 2013 at 4:31 pm

        Thanks, Christian!
        One more question:

        Would you give both the Vergelegen G.V.B. 2007 and the Collumella 2009/10 a 5 star rating? Or 18/20 maybe?
        I know these are both age worthy wines…But which one should be kept in the cellar for a longer time?

  4. CorneliaNovember 8, 2013 at 11:13 pmReply

    Christian, in your opinion, what is the maturation potential of the ’09? I ask for personal reasons. My son was born in ’09, & I’ve purchased a few ’09 magnums to put away for him. Unfortunately by the time I got around to purchasing them, it was no longer available for tasting.

    • ChristianNovember 9, 2013 at 9:27 amReplyAuthor

      Hi Cornelia, Presuming you raise your son to appreciate old wine (which I’m sure you will), he should be in for a treat on his 21st birthday. As an insurance policy, I’d get some 2009 Vintage Reserve from Boplaas or De Krans.

  5. Francois.RNovember 8, 2013 at 9:49 amReply

    Well put Christian,
    Perhaps we could do the same comparison in ten years time and then in 20…

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


AEC v1.0.4
  • No upcoming events
AEC v1.0.4
newlstter2 Get the biggest stories of the past fortnight sent directly to your inbox. subscribe

Wine magazine was published from October 1993 until September 2011 & now lives on in digital form as Winemag.co.za. We cover everything to do with SA fine wine.

XSLT Plugin by Leo Jiang