Morgenster 2003 vs. Lourens River Valley 2003

September 10, 2012
by Christian
in What I Drank Last Night
with 1 Comment

Yesterday an interesting comparison between the Morgenster 2003 and the second-label Lourens River Valley 2003 from the Somerset West property where famously Pierre Lurton of Cheval Blanc consults.

The flagship wine was a blend of 37% Cabernet Sauvignon, 33% Cabernet Franc and 30% Merlot and spent 13 months in French oak, 90% new. The second label was a blend of 68% Merlot, the rest Cabernet Sauvignon and Cabernet Franc, also 13 months in French oak, although it’s not clear how much was new.

The flagship was predictably fuller and more intense but somehow not totally convincing – I detected a definite pyrazine quality on the finish that marred the overall drinking experience (16/20). The second label was more medium bodied with red rather than black fruit and a bit of a tomato paste character. Pretty tidy (16.5/20).

Tagged , , ,

Share this post

One Comment

  1. Hennie @ BatonageSeptember 10, 2012 at 5:19 pmReply

    The Lourensriver Valley Red is probably my favourite local Bordeaux blend for every day drinking. Over delivers at the price. 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

SHOP ONLINE
winemag-storm
ADVERTISING
ADVERTISING
HOT AND HAPPENING
AEC v1.0.4
  • No upcoming events
AEC v1.0.4
ADVERTISING
newlstter2 Get the biggest stories of the past fortnight sent directly to your inbox. subscribe
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
ADVERTISING
BE SAFE

Wine magazine was published from October 1993 until September 2011 & now lives on in digital form as Winemag.co.za. We cover everything to do with SA fine wine.

XSLT Plugin by Leo Jiang