What went into the Zonnebloem Cabernet 1965?

One of the highlights of the recent South African Old Wine Tasting to mark the beginning of judging at the Old Mutual Trophy Wine Show was the Zonnebloem Cabernet 1975 (see here).

By all accounts, a lot of leeway was allowed when it came to compiling these wines and asked Elize Coetzee, part of the current Zonnebloem winemaking team, to check the records as to what actually went into this wine and here’s what she came back with:

CEZ1hoAWMAEz7XsFirstly there was a blend put together on 16 June 1965 with no indication of what vintage it was bottled as which consisted of: 34% Cabernet 1961, 31% Cabernet 1963, 18% Cabernet 1962 and 17% Pinotage 1962.





CEZ1hb3WAAAVcgrThen there was a blend put together on 22 May 1967 and evidently labelled “1963” which included 59.5% Cabernet 1965, 10% Cabernet 1966, 22.5% Pinotage 1965, 4% Cinsaut 1964 and4% Cinsaut 1965.

The two fascinating insights from the above are 1) these wines were technically “Non-Vintage” and 2) the use of Cinsaut and Pinotage which evidently have not detracted whatsoever from the age-worthiness of these wines.

Tagged , ,

Share this post


  1. Dana BuysMay 10, 2015 at 3:07 pmReply

    Very interesting to see the old records! I wonder if the F.C. was Furter Crouse per Tim’s article? Seems like quite a high % of these component wines could still have come from Zonneblom in the early 60’s.

  2. Tim JamesMay 8, 2015 at 5:35 pmReply

    PS. In fact, looking at your photos of the records again, it seems to indicate the origins of the different parcels of wine that went into the blend.

  3. Tim JamesMay 8, 2015 at 5:33 pmReply

    That is really fascinating info about the blends, and thanks for getting it. It’s worth remembering that by this time there had long been no connection apart from the name between the Zonnebloem made by Stellenbosch Farmers Winery and the famous Zonnebloems of the 40s and 50s, which came from one property of that name, and was probably much more straight Cabernet, with some Cinsaut. SFW allegedly appropriated the well established brand name in a pretty underhand way and by 1963 Zonnebloem’s grapes were not even going to SFW but to Drakenstein Coop. It’s a fascinating story, that I covered briefly on Grape, in an article (http://wp.me/p3DdtR-3e) which includes a link to a much longer bit of historical research by a Stellenbosch academic, if nanyone wants to follow it up.

  4. Christian EedesMay 8, 2015 at 4:32 pmReplyAuthor

    Hi Guy, I guess what I meant to say was the “overall greatness” of the wine. You are entirely correct that (some) Pinotage ages extremely well – I’ve been lucky enough to taste Lanzerac from the 1960s quite often and those wines are usually pretty special. What I think we should hang on to here is that while Cabernet’s credentials as a noble variety are not in question, Pinotage (and Cinsaut) aren’t normally considered in the same league but certainly did not compromise the Zonnebloems of four or five decades ago…

  5. GuyMay 8, 2015 at 3:28 pmReply

    Why would you think that Pinotage would “detract from the age-worthiness” of the wines – possibly even adds to it?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


AEC v1.0.4
  • October 26, 2016RMB WineX 2016
  • October 29, 2016Season of Sauvignon Festival
  • November 1, 2016Prescient Chardonnay Public Tasting - Café Cru, Monte Casino
  • November 2, 2016Presecient Chardonnay Public Tasting - Protea Hotel Fire&Ice!
AEC v1.0.4
newlstter2 Get the biggest stories of the past fortnight sent directly to your inbox. subscribe

Wine magazine was published from October 1993 until September 2011 & now lives on in digital form as Winemag.co.za. We cover everything to do with South African wine.

XSLT Plugin by Leo Jiang