Tim James: Observing the current wine-auction scene

By , 11 August 2025

Comment

8

In July, a six-bottle case of Kanonkop Paul Sauer 2015 sold for ZAR 21,105 at an auction held by Strauss & Co.

I’ve been musing about what’s going on with local wine-auctions. Firstly because Eben Sadie has been complaining publicly (not only with regard to auctions, but also brokerages like those of Wine Cellar and Rueda) about his older vintages being traded “at crazy prices” with “greed taking the place of ‘drinking’” (he especially doesn’t like his customers “flipping” their allocations). Secondly, because  it’s getting increasingly clear that wine auctions have been successful enough that all the auction houses now want in on the business – and yet the auctions themselves are not achieving the sales and prices that they were a year or two back.

Strauss & Co, working with wine-men Roland Peens and Higgo Jacobs and making use of the storage facilities at Wine Cellar in Cape Town, where Peens is a Director, started their auctions in 2019. I think I wasn’t popular for being doubtfuly unenthusiastic in an article called “The rise of wine speculation in South Africa”, about this move to, as Strauss said, “bring an exciting new asset class to our client base”.  I said, with leaden irony, admitting I was being curmudgeonly and over-romantic about wine: “You thought wine was for drinking with pleasure? Don’t be naive, it’s much more important than that: it’s an asset class. Transform yourselves, from wine-lovers to wine-collectors.”

Well, this strategy to help establish a firm, public secondary market for wine in South Africa prospered (and I have been both a seller and purchaser), both generally in the auction and brokerage worlds and specifically for Strauss. A recent celebratory review says that Strauss “has sold more than 68,000 bottles with an average price of R2,060 per bottle on its auction platform”. That R140 million take includes foreign wines, which have hugely dominated the top end of prices achieved for individual wines. The most successful local producers in terms of total sales value are Kanonkop and Sadie Family Wines. Next, in order of sales volumes are Meerlust, Klein Constantia (for virtually only Vin de Constance), Vilafonté, Alheit, and Mullineux.

(A word about all the sale prices mentioned in this article, for those not au fait with auctions. These are the total price that the bidder pays, comprising the “hammer price” and a commission paid to the auction house plus VAT on that, totalling something towards 25% of the hammer price; it does not include the commission that the seller also pays. No wonder that all the auction houses are muscling in on what has been a pretty successful line.)

The recent downturn is, by definition, only relative. It refers both to the volumes being sold and prices paid. To an extent it is the result, as Roland Peens told me, of a generally poor market and squeeze on buying power; and also of the passing, as he admitted, of the Covid-19 period “when prices went crazy”. Perhaps we should also connectedly invoke, as some people do, a “maturing” of the secondary market,with customers, that is, getting more sensible and less carried away by the unusual excitement of pressing that “Bid” button.

I’ve spent some hours looking at the well-organised records on the Strauss website and doing some arithmetic (you can look up any producer ever included and find a full record of the achieved sales and failed offerings.) An emblematic result is that for Kanonkop Paul Sauer 2015, the top-selling wine overall (I’m omitting CWG bottlings and larger formats in all that follows, for the sake of ease).

At three sales in 2019, a total of 42 bottles of Paul Sauer 2015 were sold for an average of R1,762. This even after Tim Atkin had famously awarded the wine 100 points. The May 2020 auction estimated an expected price in line with that, but something happened, and the average price rose to R5,784; it went even higher in June. The Covid effect, it would seem, even more than the fame brought by the Atkin score. Speculators piling in, do you think, or wine-lovers with FOMO? But Covid passed and, after a bit of a dip for a few years, Paul Sauer 2015 was still getting average prices over R4,500 in 2023 and 2024 (R1,000 a bottle more than was being paid for the 2009 vintage, for example).

A comparative collapse came only this year: in March, 27 bottles got an average of R3,604 and in July six bottles got R3,517 each. Even more telling than this decline is the fact that another six bottles didn’t find a buyer.

That’s the story of Paul Sauer 2015. More briefly, with a different point, let me tell you about another famous Stellenbosch red on Strauss auction: Le Riche Cabernet Sauvignon Reserve. Like Kanonkop, this wine showed that there is some demand for older vintages, but it’s not great. The 2000 vintage got R1,495 per bottle in 2021, and 2007s and 2009s were getting about R1,200. Some 2011s for some reason went for nearly R2,000, though most went at about half that. Not great prices. This year, 2015 Le Riche Cab Reserve has been going for R1,270. That’s a famous vintage, now approaching maturity, being sold for scarcely more than the current 2021 costs retail. The seller will probably have lost money on the deal, given inflation and the costs of storage. The buyer did nicely.

Let’s look at a few other well-known, supposedly rather “cultish” wines. At the Cape Heritage sale ths year, Van Loggerenberg Kameraderie Chenin 2018 got R625 per bottle, and this is not an untypical price received for various vintages of this wine over the years. It’s less than R100 more than the current vintage. David&Nadia Aristargos 2013 and 2014 did reasonably well at R586 – a vaguely decent jump, at least, on the current release price of about R450, though the seller is unlikely to have made a profit if they’d been paying storage costs at Wine Cellar, for example, also taking inflation into account. But four lots of Badenhorst single-vineyard chenins didn’t even sell at their lower estimate of around R700. Nor did a number of Sadie whites sell (which I suppose would please Eben if it means they get drunk instead), while Palladius 2016 and Skurfberg 2014 got, respectively, R2,540 and R1,465, more in line with the high prices Sadie wines usually get.

Generally, it seems to me that there are a few producers (especially Sadie and Alheit) whose wines mostly get great prices, making decent money for the seller as well as the auctioneer; some are more in the Le Riche mould described above, and others are inbetween. The secondary market is very patchy, at best. I would say that, for more middling producers, the auctions at present offer great deals for wine lovers who want maturing or mature wines for which someone else has paid the storage costs – and Strauss at least is careful about the provenances of wines they sell, though I’m not at all sure that all auction houses are.

The aim and hope of the auction houses and brokerages – as well as those wine-buyers who have the speculation bug – is to build a viable secondary market for Cape wine. I think we can say they have effectively started the process, but there’s a way to go. It needs more people buying and carefully laying down wine; at present the supply of older vintages – pre-2015, say – is very limited. That, together with buying and selling it, also requires confidence in the value of maturing such wines to go beyond the pretty small element of the industry that presently enjoys it. I suppose it also needs more people with a taste and appreciation for older wine, and that’s no more universal than is the ability to afford serious wine.

  • Tim James is one of South Africa’s leading wine commentators, contributing to various local and international wine publications. His book Wines of South Africa – Tradition and Revolution appeared in 2013.

Comments

8 comment(s)

Please read our Comments Policy here.

  • Greg Sherwood | 11 August 2025

    Just like fine wine has become an expensive business, so too, sadly, has wine storage services. Very necessary for fine wines that need to be aged but also an expensive game. Storage in the UK is now possibly a more profitable business than buying and speculating on new release fine wines themself! As a result, more and more people are forgoing the storage of wines and look to buy ready to drink maturing vintages that, as you say, someone else has paid the decade of more of storage bills, which in the UK, are considerable per case. As costs rise, you will see the fine wine market evolve further. Storing average fine wines that are not rare or sought after will become a zero sum game.

  • Jos | 11 August 2025

    The cost of cellaring is indeed very expensive. Wine Cellar charges around R24 per bottle p.a when you store it in a case of 6. That means that a R500 bottle will be increasing in cost by 4.8% p.a then inflation gets added of say 5%, which is roughly 10% p.a.

    So, if you want to sell that wine 4 years later, you have to charge a price that factors in the 5 years of cellaring cost and inflation to get a return. Then when you factor in what you would have received if you just invested that in an equity or multi asset fund, you quickly find out that wine is a terrible investment 95% of the time.

    So you really cannot blame people for wanting to buy aged wines, but I will say that wines at Straus auctions are not cheap as Tim pointed out. If you have money to burn they are great and wines tend to be in good condition, but don’t ever expect a bargain.

  • GillesP | 12 August 2025

    Hello Tim, I have been following the Strauss wine auctions quite closely for about 3 years now and these are some of my observations:

    1/ It seems to me that many lots of the same wines are being re-auctioned regularly (Sadie wines, Kanonkop Paul Sauer, Merlust Rubicon, Le Riche) making me think that some people are buying with the hope to flip the same wines again for a profit (which is harder and harder to obtain for the reasons you have well described)

    2/ Foreign wines are getting less traction in general and high end Burgundy are not selling at their international market value but much lower or not at all.

    3/ You can find the odd good deal when studying very well item value ahead of the auction and monitor carefully on the bidding process or purchase post auction if the wine has not been sold at minimum asking price. I find myself happy with the price I bought 4 bottles of Chateau Yquem from different vintages at what I consider half their international market value.

    4/ When too many participants are bidding each other up for the same item, you can be assured that you will overpay for the wine at stake.
    It feels that sometimes, there is a group of bidders which seems to do that for fun of winning.

    5/ Not that many people participate in these wine auctions and I highly suspect these are the same 100 to 200 people who register and buy very regularly.

  • Craig Cunningham | 16 August 2025

    I’ve been a recent participant (seller) in the Strauss auctions not because I’m flipping my older vintages but rather that I find myself with too much wine and am not drinking it fast enough! I will say they run a very professional operation and I’ve gained trust in their pricing and ability to move what I’m not going to get to in my cellar. Naturally there is some remorse in them selling my best collectables (some of which I’ve not even tasted) but rather that than them going wasted.

  • GillesP | 16 August 2025

    One of major setback with the Strauss Auction house is the 15% commission on the Seller and the same on the buyer. This is colossal fee. I was chatting this week with a friend from the UK who told me that when selling expansive Malts, the fees there were nothing as high as that.

  • Donald Griffiths | 17 August 2025

    The biggest issue with the secondary wine market is that it turns an honourable and economically vital agricultural craft into a speculative asset class in which the bulk of the costs and the risks fall on growers, producers and loyal drinkers, all combining to affect the long-term health and sustainability of the industry. When the bulk of the value accrues to the secondary speculative layer instead of to the vineyard and cellar and this is not invested back into vine planting, cellar operations and quality control, the wrong wines get made for the wrong reasons and are sold to the wrong people at the wrong prices.
    Great wine deserves a market that rewards stewardship, transparency, and community. That starts with putting producers and real wine lovers back at the centre of attention and treating speculation as a side show, not the main event.

  • Brendan | 17 August 2025

    It’s only tho 100-pointers, and a literal handful of other rare or hard to acquire flagships that are going to outperform cash as an asset class, after all costs are settled. While I agree we wouldn’t want to see meaningful proportions of these allocations going to auction houses, I don’t think this is at all the case currently. I greatly appreciate the ability to browse the Wine Cellar brokerage lists, most wines are at a fair price, given the storage is paid for, and you can trust the provenance. I have also been able to fund some fine wine drinking by making a few timely retail pick-ups and sales on the platform. Ultimately all the wine is drunk by people that value it. I feel like this is a net positive for the local scene.

  • Tim James | 17 August 2025

    My appreciation for your trouble in making these comments, which mostly add to what I was trying to say, sometimes expressing my thought better than I did, sometimes adding useful insights (Brendan – I think Eben Sadie should certainly take your point).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Like our content?

Show your support.


Subscribe