Home Opinion & Analysis

SA 2005 under review

4
SHARE
Image courtesy of Batonage.com.
Image courtesy of Batonage.com.

Recently a tasting of 12 wines from the 2005 vintage courtesy of colleague Angela Lloyd (read her report here). Three flights of four as follows: Flight One – Vergelegen White, Boekenhoutskloof Semillon, Hamilton Russell Vineyards Chardonnay and Hartenberg Riesling; Flight Two – Hartenberg Gravel Hill Shiraz, Quoin Rock Syrah, Waterford CWG Reserve and Waterford The Jem; and Flight Three – Vergelegen Cabernet Franc Merlot, Vilafonté Series C, Thelema Cabernet Sauvignon and Boekenhoutskloof Cabernet Sauvignon.

Sadly, I was left underwhelmed. All the whites were in decline if not undrinkable – tasting blind, my favourite wine (with a score of 90/100) was the Hartenberg but I wasn’t confident that it was a Riesling – there was lots about it that suggested “exotic white blend” – and no doubt the 18g/l RS had helped preserve it and probably still adds to its appeal.

As for the reds, they were all more or less hanging on but few if any at all have become more complex or interesting by virtue of bottle maturation. Stellenbosch was, according to most sources, hot, dry and early and the wines from here and environs are typically super-concentrated.

My favourite wine of the day was The Jem from Waterford (58% Cabernet Sauvignon, 12% Shiraz, 11% Mourvèdre, 7% Malbec, 7% Merlot, 2% Sangiovese and 3% Barbera.). Red and black fruit with some floral perfume. Relatively medium bodied with freshness and fine tannins. Good fruit purity and great length. Still very much alive and I gave it an upbeat score of 94/100.

All very humbling as I think I was alone among the eight tasters gathered in feeling enthusiastic about this wine. Moreover, when I had the 2005, 2007 and 2009 of The Jem next to each other back in mid-2013, I said it had “rustic appeal” and gave it a score of 88/100 (see here). What was particularly mortifying this time around is that the wine came after the Waterford Auction Reserve (80% Cabernet Sauvignon, 10% Merlot and 10% Malbec) which as recently as February of this year, I rated 95/100 (see here).

Context matters so much when it comes to wine tasting and side by side on this particular day, the Cab-driven Auction Reserve looked very “green” next to multi-variety The Jem. You live, you learn.

4 COMMENTS

  1. Recently I’ve had great comments about a couple of 2005 magnums that our clients drank recently. Would be interesting to have a tasting comparing the same wines, 750ml vs. 1.5l and seeing how ageability differs in the 2 formats.

  2. I’m still drinking the Mulderbosch Chardonnay 2005 100% Barrel fermented. Mike Dobrovic did a very good Job. The wine is still great. No signs off beeing tired. I’m sad, only one bottle left!!!

    • Hi Dieter, I was at a dinner party hosted by my friend and colleague James Pietersen about six weeks ago where the Mulderbosch BF 2005 was shown next to Ataraxia 2005 and Uva Mira 2005 – all the wines showed very well, the Uva Mira in particular, once again suggesting that this is a property to watch. My sense about the Hamilton Russell Vineyards mentioned in the main post was that it suffered from random bottle oxidation (I’ve had the wine recently and I remember it being in much better shape). Suffice to say, I think Chardonnay is probably as age-worthy as anything that SA does, white or red.

  3. Yesterday we had the pleasure to drink a De Toren Fusion 5 2005. Slightly bricky in colour, but still very drinkable. Little bit leaner than I expected. Still enough fruit to enjoy. Altogether a good experience.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here