Greg Sherwood MW: Adding further context to the “10 Years On Tasting”
By Greg Sherwood, 18 June 2025
9
Judging and assessing wines is part and parcel of what wine critics, wine journalists, and wine buyers do on a daily basis. But scoring wines, whether tasted sighted or blind, is an altogether more difficult task that requires experience and plenty of practise if the numerical scores applied to such wines are to be fair and representative of the true quality of the wine inside the bottle. While there will always be a subtle element of subjectivity in this process, rating wines should, at the very least, strive to be as objective as humanly possible.
In my last column, I profiled the fascinating “South Africa’s New Wave Tasting – Ten Years On” tasing that was held recently in London. With the intention of the undertaking primarily to capture as much qualitative feedback around the maturity and qualities of the wines as possible, the organisers felt my publishing of the group’s average scores was not accompanied by sufficient context and analysis, thus distilling the emphasis of the tasting down to a more score-driven exercise, which of course it was not intended to be.
I’ll readily concede that a broad “10 years on” tasting of nearly 80 premium South African wines deserves deeper discussion and analysis. That said, I’m not entirely convinced the group’s average scores were artificially low – perhaps because I fully expected that outcome the moment the organisers opted to average blind scores across a large panel of tasters. Nevertheless, I think Winemag readers will find my own personal scores for the individual flights equally enlightening and dare I say, perhaps more representative?
Given the limited scope of this tasting, the results did not aim to represent a comprehensive view of the Cape’s 2015 vintage, rather the first in an annual series of such tastings intended to chart the growth and quality / stylistic trajectory of many of the most acclaimed and commercially relevant “New Wave” producers available in the UK. Looking ahead, it is envisaged that the number of producers represented in the tasting will grow as new projects come on stream in 2016, 2017, etc. whilst the number of wines per existing producers in the tasting will need to shrink to accommodate a wider sample set of relevant producers.
Headline Positives:
A strong showing in the Swartland, both red and white. The group felt it evidenced the region’s pioneering of the quality revolution in the period post 2010.
White Bordeaux blends and single varietals was arguably the most surprising flight, producing some of the most youthful and impressive wines of the day.
Chardonnay proved a strong category with solid performances across the board in a range of styles.
White blends proved divisive, though the best wines shone. A style unique to, and a calling card for, the best of modern South Africa – though also a category that needs more education.
Syrah demonstrated its huge potential, and ability to age, consistent across regions.
Chenin Blanc from the Swartland – again, youthful, intense, complex and ageworthy. The overall most exciting white flight.
Headline Criticisms / Drawbacks:
Inconsistency of closures, as all tasters were forewarned, proved to be an issue. Approximately 30% failure rate across the whole tasting which at times damaged confidence in the wines.
The group concede the limitation of the format when it comes to assessing reductive and fragile varieties such as Syrah and Pinot – most agreeing that the wines deserved (more) time in the glass.
The more aromatic varieties (reds): Pinot Noir, Grenache, and certain blends, were felt to suffer more from inconsistent closures – accentuating varying maturation rates and a drying out of the fruit.
The group discussed the reality of tasting wines from often young vines i.e. Hemel-en-Aarde, where though the 2015s broadly showed well, there was a sense that the best is still to come.
Stellenbosch Chenin Blanc and South Coast Syrah were too small sample sizes to draw any meaningful conclusions on a bigger scale. These regions will naturally grow in representation over time.
Below is a summary of my personal blind scores for the wines:
Flight 1 – Pinot Noir |
Score |
Hamilton Russell Vineyards |
88/100 |
Storm Vrede |
89/100 |
Crystallum Cuvée Cinema |
92/100 |
Crystallum Mababel |
90/100 |
Newton Johnson Family Vineyards |
91/100 |
Storm Ignis |
89/100 |
Storm Ridge |
90/100 |
Newton Johnson CWG Seadragon |
91/100 |
Crystallum Bona Fide |
88/100 |
When I score Pinot Noir from South Africa, or anywhere else for that matter, I always use Burgundy as my benchmark. I know producers are not trying to copy Burgundy per se, but I cannot abide by one set of scoring criteria for one country / region and another set of scoring criteria for another. In my opinion, these 10-year-old Pinot Noirs showed admirably well. Expecting them to score much high is slightly delusional. However, newer vintages from these producers may very well age better than these 2015s.
Flight 2 – Mediterranean Varieties (Single Varietal) |
Score |
Momento Tinta Barocca |
92/100 |
The Foundry Grenache Noir |
94/100 |
AA Badenhorst Raaigras |
95/100 |
Momento Grenache Noir |
94/100 |
Badenhorst Brak-Kuil Barbarossa |
91/100 |
Wow, what a strong flight with some impressively high scores. The Foundry from Chris Williams is a perennial star performer and always ages incredibly well, while Adi’s reds can be a little bit hard work, foursquare and tight when very young, but that’s undoubtedly because they have the stuffing to age well in a true classical sense. Marelise at Momento makes beautifully precise wines that should also age very well.
Flight 3 – Mediterranean Red Blends |
Score |
Badenhorst Kalmoesfontein |
93/100 |
Sadie Family Columella |
91/100 |
Savage Follow the Line |
93/100 |
David & Nadia Elpidios |
91/100 |
Savage Red |
88/100 |
Rall Red |
92/100 |
Bit of a mixed bag for me here. Great to see Duncan’s Follow the Line performing so well but I think the Savage Red was not a great individual bottle? Once again, Adi’s red blend had a wonderful depth and power and Donovan Rall’s Red was pinpoint and classy.
Flight 4 – Syrah Cape South Coast |
Score |
|
Lismore Estate Reserve |
94/100 |
|
Kershaw Dec. Lake District Cartref SH9C |
91/100 |
|
Kershaw Dec. Groenland. Bokkeveld Shale SH9C |
90/100 |
|
Kershaw Dec. Lake District Cartref SH22 |
89/100 |
A small flight from the early days of Kershaw Syrah but also a series of wines that has most definitely grown in quality and stature with more recent releases. But no denying Samantha O’Keefe’s Syrah pedigree from Greyton. True class.
Flight 5 – Syrah Stellenbosch |
Score |
Craven Faure Vineyard |
90/100 |
Keermont |
91/100 |
Keermont Topside |
91/100 |
Reyneke Reserve Red |
89/100 |
Keermont Steepside |
92/100 |
De Morgenzon Reserve |
88/100 |
Flight 6 – Syrah Swartland |
Score |
Solms Delta Swartland |
91/100 |
Boekenhoutskloof |
93/100 |
Mullineux |
92/100 |
Porseleinberg |
89/100* |
Mullineux Schist |
87/100* |
*I felt my samples were slightly oxidised.
These two Syrah flights seemed to suffer more than some of the other red categories. I found the wines slightly oxidative, overly savoury and lacking freshness. 2015 Syrahs are not at all “old” in my mind, so these bottles are not particularly representative of the vintage for me. Closure issues to the fore here again?
Flight 7 – Bordeaux Red Blends & Single Varietal |
Score |
Miles Mossop Max |
93/100 |
Leeu Passant Dry Red |
94/100 |
Boekenhoutskloof Stellenbosch Cab Sauv |
95/100 |
Boekenhoutskloof Franschhoek Cab Sauv |
96/100 |
Restless River Cab Sauv |
94/100 |
Boekenhoutskloof Journeyman |
97/100 |
Gabrielskloof Cabernet Franc |
93/100 |
This was a fantastic flight that really showed the class and pedigree of the Cape’s Bordeaux Blend category. The standout has got to be how well all the Boekenhoutskloof wines are ageing, including the Syrah above. Big ripe wines when young, they also have the capacity of age incredibly well. As for the Journeyman, what a phenomenal wine that I recently tasted during a full sighted vertical with Marc Kent in February in London. Great to see I scored this wine 97/100 sighted and blind!
My individual white wine scores:
Flight 8 – Chardonnay |
Score |
De Morgenzon Reserve |
92/100 |
Crystallum Clay Shales |
94/100 |
Hamilton Russell |
92/100 |
Restless River Ava Marie |
94/100 |
Storm Vrede |
92/100 |
Newton Johnson Family Vineyards |
92/100 |
Lismore Estate Reserve |
92/100 |
Leeu Passant Radicales Libres |
93/100 |
A genuinely exciting line up of wines. A few years earlier and they would have been riper, more honied and less fresh. This group of wines were all very impressive, proving that South Africa’s best Chardonnay producers are certainly making age-worthy wines. If these were tasted sighted, some may have even cracked a point higher.
Flight 9 – Chenin Stellenbosch & Other |
Score |
Keermont Riverside |
93/100 |
De Morgenzon Reserve |
95/100 |
Alheit Radio Lazarus |
93/100 |
Alheit Magnetic North |
94/100 |
Patatsfontein Steen |
93/100 |
Cartology |
95/100 |
Flight 10 – Chenin Swartland |
Score |
The Liberator Episode 16 – Perfectly Flawed (Fable) |
93/100 |
David & Nadia |
94/100 |
Gabrielskloof Elodie |
92/100 |
David & Nadia Skaliekop |
94/100 |
Mullineux Granite |
93/100 |
David & Nadia Hoe-Steen |
95/100 |
The Fledge & Company Klipsringer |
96/100 |
Looking at the two Chenin Blanc flights, it seemed there was some controversy over the groups low average scores. Looking back at my individual scores I think the wines are holding up very well. Of course there are always surprises, in this instance, it is undoubtedly the Cartology, David & Nadia, the De Morgenzon and The Fledge & Co. examples. A solid category as expected.
Flight 11 – Cape White Blends |
Score |
Sadie Family Wines Palladius |
90/100* |
Badenhorst Kalmoesfontein White |
93/100 |
Beaumont New Baby |
95/100 |
David & Nadia Aristargos |
93/100 |
Mullineux Old Vines White |
92/100 |
Momento Chenin Blanc Verdelho |
90/100 |
Rall White |
90/100 |
Keermont Terrasses |
88/100 |
Miles Mossop Saskia |
94/100 |
*Slightly oxidative
Some interesting wine in the Cape White Blend flight. The Palladius was a little oxidative unfortunately and can certainly show a lot better than this performance based on other bottles I have drunk recently. Slow and steady from Mullineux’s Old Vine white, but special mention has to go to the maiden release of Sebastian Beaumont’s New Baby Chenin Blanc. Truly exceptional quality.
Flight 12 – Sauvignon/Semillon Blends |
Score |
Reyneke Reserve White |
94/100 |
The Liberator Episode 8 – An Arrogance of Sommeliers (Vergelegen) |
93/100 |
Gabrielskloof Magdalena |
94/100 |
Alheit La Colline |
91/100 |
Boekenhoutskloof Semillon |
94/100 |
Thorne & Daughters Paper Kite |
93/100 |
Last but not least, the Sauvignon / Semillon Blends flight lived up to its high expectations, with all the wines showing impressively well. Hard to pick out favourites, but looking at my notes, the Boekenhoutskloof Semillon and the Reyneke Reserve White were both real stand out treats showing youthful exuberance and plenty of freshness.
I will have to wait and see if I get invited back next year for the second “Steenwold” tasting, as someone has already coined this event, which will preview the 2016 vintage in which Neal Martin famously scored the Kanonkop Paul Sauer 2016 higher than the score he gave the Tim Atkin MW 100-point 2015! If I am involved again, I will almost certainly dispense with referencing the group’s averaged scores and will simply focus on my own individual ratings which always make more sense to me.
- Greg Sherwood was born in Pretoria, South Africa, and as the son of a career diplomat, spent his first 21 years traveling the globe with his parents. With a Business Management and Marketing degree from Webster University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, Sherwood began his working career as a commodity trader. In 2000, he decided to make more of a long-held interest in wine taking a position at Handford Wines in South Kensington, London, working his way up to the position of Senior Wine Buyer over 22 years. Sherwood currently consults to a number of top fine wine merchants in London while always keeping one eye firmly on the South African wine industry. He qualified as the 303rd Master of Wine in 2007.
Keith Prothero | 21 June 2025
Thanks for the excellent summary Greg .
As you are well aware, I have long questioned why so many Cape producers use cork closure when screwcap is more reliable and certainly far more customer friendly. And don’t tell me they don’t age as well under screwcap !! As someone who has a large cellar of Australian wine , there is no question that this closure is age worthy and far more reliable than traditional cork .
And don’t get me onto the subject of wax !! Pretentious nonsense .
Kwispedoor | 23 June 2025
Agreed, Keith. I guess some people merely say that wines age better under cork, because they’ve been let to believe so (mainly because, in most countries anyway, the better wines have often been bottled under cork and the cheaper wines under screwcap). Ask for any actual evidence that backs up the claim that cork is better in the long run, and the silence is deafening.
Julian Wannell | 21 June 2025
I think a lot depends on whether these wines are being scored against their peers from other wine producing countries – or just against other wines from SA. There is a big difference.
It seems that what Greg was intimating from his comment about the Pinot Noir scores is that he scores against Burgundy, or rather using Burgundy as the benchmark, which in my opinion is as it should be.
Ergo it should probably follow that Bordeaux blends are scored against real Bordeaux; Rhone blends likewise, and so on. Anyone who knows the great French wines will also know that they have a proven ability to age well. Less is known about SA wines in this context, partly as so many are drunk young and partly because the ‘revolution’ in SA winemaking and breadth of offering is still relatively young, so there isn’t always sufficient empirical evidence.
Kwispedoor | 19 June 2025
Hi Greg
Thanks for this insight. Some producers like the idea of natural variation that natural cork brings, but I think that’s only fun and interesting over the short to medium term. As this tasting confirms (and as basically any regular consumer of old wine can attest to) , it can too often get really disappointing over the medium to long term. Why a producer of quality wine would knowingly play the lottery with closures remains curious indeed to the end consumer…
As far as the scores go, I understand that scoring wine is not an exact science and that it’s difficult to taste a large amount of wines at one event. However, the majority of people at this event who taste wine for a living would probably contend that their scoring methodology is sensible and that their scoring is, at least to a large degree, dependable. Presumably, they’d also expect their readers to regard their scores as meaningful. So surely, the scores should be open to some degree of scrutiny? Not to highlight that anyone has done something wrong, but just to understand this tasting and its results better.
My gut feel is that – ignoring the ones that had cork issues – you generally might have scored all of these wines (bar a few) higher upon release. I might be wrong, but perhaps you have easier access to the exact figures? It would be really interesting to see a comparison between your scores at release and your scores now. That goes for all the tasters who have also sored some of these wines when they were younger.
If it does happen that you’ve scored them lower here, it can only be due to one (or a combination) of the following factors: conservative scoring on the day, not really enjoying the way that the wines mature, or the wines not standing the test of time. All of these will be completely understandable and none of these would be scandalous. The only possible issue would really be if it happens to be largely the latter reason – wines that don’t stand the test of time should be cheaper than these wines generally are. Or at the very least, such producers should encourage early consumption.
Kwispedoor | 23 June 2025
Almost on cue, I’ve opened a 2018 Grenache (under natural cork) from a great producer tonight, only to find it full of TCA. Perhaps those who find cork romantic can explain to me how looking forward to drinking a wine and finding it corked, then having to open something else, is romantic.
Jos | 19 June 2025
Has the closure issue been addressed to your knowledge? These aren’t garage producers that sell discount wines so I expect them to ensure they use quality components.
Ryan Coetzee | 18 June 2025
Oh, and who organizes a 2015 tasting and doesn’t include the Paul Sauer? Perverse. Same for the Compostella and Lady May, among some others.
Greg Sherwood MW | 18 June 2025
Ryan
For your reference, the producer selection is clearly based around the wines from wineries who exhibited at the very first “New Wave Tasting” in London in 2015 (obviously not showing 2015 vintage wines though!) A slightly abstract context for South African readers I do agree.
Perhaps the remit needs to be widened to include “other” top producers like Kanonkop, MR, Le Riche etc. But that’s certainly not my call. Where do you draw the line though? Who decides who makes the cut and who doesn’t. You can’t be tasting 200 wines. 80 to 100 is about the max I’d want to taste properly in a single day. With the big tasting names there, I’d expect many producers would love to have their 10 year old wines tasted annually in a big blind premium tasting.
Ryan Coetzee | 18 June 2025
Sorry but this whole event seems to have been ill-conceived. First, if it was to assess quality, then nothing wrong with publishing the average scores. Deeply suspicious of a bunch of tasters who then complain when their scores are revealed. Second, whoever organized it might have done a better job of getting decent bottles. I had the 2013 Porseleinberg earlier this year and it was fresh as a daisy. Had the 2015 Radio Lazarus and it was 95 points on a bad day. Third, their attempt to justify the low average scores with the word “context” smacks of politicians being caught out. Their scores were their scores. Either stand by them, and SA must come to terms with the reality, or just admit the whole thing was a mess.