Hunter Valley vs SA Shiraz

By , 6 September 2016



Leeuwenkuil Heritage Syrah 2014

When the lion roars…

Today saw a comparative tasting of Hunter Valley and South African Shiraz, 12 top examples of each, held in Fresnaye, Cape Town. Out of the 24 wines tasted, South Africa took the top five places, with a further two in the top 10.

The event was undertaken partly as an exercise in self-education, partly as “a pistols-at-dawn showdown”, with Grant Dodd, the Australian CEO of Haskell Vineyards, sourcing the Hunter Valley wines and the local wines selected by me.

The panel consisted of me, Dodd, Platter’s taster Hennie Coetzee, well-known local commentator Tim James and James Pietersen of Wine Cellar. The tasting was conducted blind with scoring according to the 100-point scale.

The Hunter Valley line-up was as follows:

Brokenwood Graveyard Vineyard 2014
Bimbadgen Signature Palmers Lane 2014
David Hook Pothana Vineyard 2014
De Iuliis 2014
First Creek Winemaker’s Reserve  2014
Gundog Estate The 48 Block 2014
Mount Pleasant Mountain A 2014
Mount Pleasant Rosehill Vineyard 2014
Silkman Reserve 2014
Thomas Kiss  2014
Tyrrell’s Wines Single Vineyard Stevens 2014
Tyrrell’s Wines Vat 9  2014

By way of context, Dodd supplied the following information regarding the Hunter Valley: “It is Australia’s oldest, and most visited wine growing region, primarily by virtue of its proximity to Sydney, the first place of settlement in Australia.

It may also be Australia’s most maligned. The Hunter Valley has an unfortunate habit of receiving the bulk of its yearly rainfall right in the middle of harvest, creating a variability in the regions wines that affects its reputation. At the same time, the Hunter has the distinction of producing many of Australia’s greatest, and most long lived wines, going all the way back to the legendary Mt Pleasant wines made by Maurice O’Shea in the 1940s and 50s. These wines are still regarded as benchmarks by the Australian wine community, and fetch upwards of R50 000 a bottle on the secondary market.

Back in the day, these wines were largely marketed under the banner of “Hunter River Burgundy”, reflecting the savoury, medium bodied style in which many of the wines were made. Recent years have seen many leading ( and new) producers pay homage to that era in reverting to a style that is closer to medium bodied, and which expresses the terroir of the best sites in the region. Despite vintage variability, in years where the weather gods smile on the Hunter Valley, truly great wines are produced. Such a year was 2014, a vintage that is described by some winemakers as the best since 1965.”

The SA line-up was as follows:

Boekenhoutskloof 2014
Eagles’ Nest 2013
Haskell Hades 2014
Keermont 2013
Lismore 2015
Leeuwenkuil Heritage 2014
Mother Rock 2015
Mullineux 2014
Reyneke Reserve 2013
Richard Kershaw 2013
Tokara Reserve 2013
Waterkloof Circumstance 2013

The overall top 10 wines were:
1. Leeuwenkuil Heritage 2014 – 94.8
2. Boekenhoutskloof 2014 – 94
3. Keermont 2013 – 93.6
4. Waterkloof Circumstance 2013 – 93.4
5. Reyneke Reserve 2013 – 93.2
6. Tyrrell’s Wines Vat 9 2014 – 92.8
7. Silkman Reserve 2014 – 92.6
8. Mother Rock 2015 – 92.4
9. Brokenwood Graveyard Vineyard 2014 – 92.2
10. Haskell Hades 2014 – 92

My top wines were:

1. Waterkloof Circumstance 2013 – 96
2.= Leeuwenkuil Reserve 2014 – 95
2.= Silkman Reserve 2014 – 95
4. Reyneke Reserve 2013 – 94
5.= David Hook Pothana Vineyard 2014 – 93
5.= Keermont 2013 – 93
5.= Mount Pleasant Mountain A 2014 – 93
5.= Mother Rock 2015 – 93

The average score was 92 and there was very little in qualitative terms to separate any of the wines. Was it easy to discern country of origin? Pietersen correctly identified this in 16 out of the 24 wines his thesis being that the Hunter Valley wines were marked by red rather than black fruit and particularly tangy acidity than what he was used to on local wines. Coetzee, on the other hand, said that many of the wines that turned out to be South African were marked by a “stemmy” character.

To my mind, however, decisions concerning picking date seemed to over-ride matters of terroir, some very pretty wines from grapes harvested early in evidence from both countries. As Dodd remarked, phenolic under-ripeness is punished with other varieties but has come to be appreciated when it comes to Shiraz.


7 comment(s)

Please read our Comments Policy here.

    Richard Andrews | 7 September 2016

    I think it is fair to say that in general the best Australian Shiraz does NOT come from the Hunter Valley. Therefore this tasting exercise, while interesting, is somewhat meaningless in terms of any results, and rather fails to give any idea of how the best of SA shiraz compares with the best of Aussie shiraz. Note that my comments should NOT be seen as any attempt to put down SA wine. I am a big fan and have introduced South African wines to many wine loving friends here in NZ, who have been enjoying the point of difference that a good SA wine can make to a tasting.

    Jeanette | 7 September 2016

    Great to see SA wines come out on top. Question – why no wines from the Robertson Wine Valley? It is a very good region for Shiraz

      Kwispedoor | 9 September 2016

      Hi, Jeanette

      I’m interested: if you could have picked the strongest lineup of SA shirazes to compete in this tasting, which wine(s) in this 12-bottle lineup would would you have excluded and in favour of which Robertson shiraz(es) would you have done this?

    Hennie Taljaard | 7 September 2016

    contact me next time you do this – I will donate a bottle of Porseleinberg!

    Smirrie | 7 September 2016

    Well done SA wine.

    It seems that the Leeuwenkuil Heritage Syrah is racing to become a cult wine.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Like our content?

Show your support.