Tim James: Something stirs at Platter’s – but to what end?
By Tim James, 2 June 2026
2
In a recent article, Christian Eedes remarked (somewhat cheekily) that “the much-loved Platter’s guide now appears to be nearing the end of a glorious 46-year run”. The recently appointed GM at Platter’s, Christina “Bubbles” Hyland, clearly thought it even more presumptuous than cheeky and offered the comment that “Platters is most definitely not coming to an end.”
Albeit terse, this was a relief to those who would hate to see Platter’s disappear (or change its mission too emphatically) – even if scarcely enough to dispel all doubts. But, given the rumours of a sale and the well-known fact that nothing significant has been done about getting work for the next edition underway, Christian’s remark was not unreasonable. Apart from belatedly appointing a GM, the owner of the Guide, Diners Club, seemed to observers by its silence to be merely continuing its remarkably lax attitude to managing what was once a real treasure of the South African wine industry – and, some would say, continuing its bland incompetence.
No editor, no plan – and mounting uncertainty
The Guide had no editor. Last year, after being kept on past the age when he was originally supposed to retire, long-serving editor Philip van Zyl, had, I believe, been given a new contract that explicitly stated it would not be renewed this year. Despite his long, and I would guess wearisome, relations with his Diners Club bosses, he must have presumed or at least hoped that they would themselves have taken a few steps to ensure some continuity, even if he know nothing about them.
But no. Approaching June, there was no editor, the regular tasters knew nothing of any plan. In brief, apart from the good start of appointing a GM (lacking for some years, all the extra work being picked up by van Zyl) there was nothing being done to get the huge process of producing the next edition of Platter’s started. There were rumours that the Guide was for sale … had been sold … was virtually sold…. Industry people then became aware that the editorship was being offered around sequentially to a number of people. No-one seemed willing to take it on. Hardly surprisingly given that everyone knew what a big job it was and also knew the reputation that Diners Club had earned for itself as owner.

Bubbles Hyland.
Hence Christian’s remark. And Ms Hyland’s rebuttal.
I had long been hoping that some journalist would try to follow up the matter, which is in fact of some concern to the wine industry (despite some uncertainties about the Guide’s continuing relevance, especially given that an ever-increasing number of producers declined to participate, and the design of the Guide still seemed the result of thinking little had changed since 1980 except the coming and going of fax numbers). But there was no investigation into the situation, and I felt that I should stand back from trying to elicit the facts, given that I had once been deeply involved in Platter’s and had resigned a few years ago as a taster and Associate Editor (see here for my reasons for resigning, in an article which gave offence to at least some principal players). I wasn’t at all sure that the ex-editor or the current owners would even speak to me.
New rumours circulated! Perhaps something was happening, in terms of both production gearing up and a sale. It really seemed time to forget niceties and see what might be possible to discover, especially as there was a new GM (busily if unsuccessfully hawking around the editorship) to ask. So I wrote to Ms Hyland.
And in fact I got a friendly and partly useful response last Friday. Though some of the usefulness was in omissions and evasions. Ms Hyland attached a formal statement, which, she said, would be “sent to the industry” that day (I’ve seen no evidence of anyone making use of it yet). The email to me was in fact more useful, especially as she added that “Philip van Zyl has returned to Platter’s in an editorial capacity for the 2027 edition”. Another stop-gap appointment, clearly, born of a belated desperation. I have no idea how she persuaded Philip to do another year. I do hope she was obliged to offer a whole whack of payment. Knowing Philip a little, I think it quite possible that he was (also?) moved by a desire to save the Guide that he’d worked so devotedly for over decades. I daresay that, with a bit of trimming and some help, Philip might even get it out this year, if the producers cooperate.
Ms Hyland added that “Matters relating to ownership, commercial discussions, or any potential transactions remain confidential and subject to formal processes and approvals.” The usefulness of the sentence is merely to essentially confirm that weighty matters are indeed being conducted. A sale, presumably? The mention of “formal processes and approvals” I do, for some reason, find ominous – though it possibly explains why Diners Club is being so unforthcoming about selling Platter’s (getting rid of the damn thing with a sigh of relief, I suspect would be close to the truth). This is, Ms Hyland says, “a year of transition” – good start, but from what to what?
The press release itself added little of interest. Bland in the extreme, it mostly confirmed the brief comment made on this website and said that “work on the 2027 edition is actively underway”, though “certain timelines have required adjustment because of our incompetence” (I admit that the last four words there are my interpolation). “Further updates will be shared in due course”, we are assured. Oh good. And there is another bit that I find ominous where it says that “Platter’s is also exploring exciting new opportunities around digital integration, broader audience engagement, and enhanced wine-tourism alignment as part of the guide’s future development.” As long as it’s not Diners Club doing the exploring, which would make the description of possibility even more ominous.
“A year of transition” – and what comes next?
Actually, by far the most interesting thing about the press release is that It was headed “Platter’s South African Wine Guide Confirms Work Underway on 2027 Edition”. Do you note how the title is shortened from the usual “Platter’s by Diner’s Club International…”?. In fact, the release only mentions Diners Club very small in the logo.
There is another bit that I find ominous (perhaps because the conjunction of Diners Club intentions and Platter’s now always make me nervous). The release says that “Platter’s is also exploring exciting new opportunities around digital integration, broader audience engagement, and enhanced wine-tourism alignment as part of the guide’s future development.” Could be great, especially if Diners Club is no longer involved as I hope, but is it really likely to be great? Is Philip van Zyl stepping in to save the guide from a fate worse than death? I’m not optimistic. But hope I’m wrong.
- Tim James is one of South Africa’s leading wine commentators, contributing to various local and international wine publications. His book Wines of the New South Africa – Tradition and Revolution appeared in 2013.


Kwispedoor | 2 June 2026
Recently, someone I know opened a Bellingham Noble Late Harvest 1987, but couldn’t find any info about the wine anywhere, including via an exhaustive Internet search. So I simply picked up my 1990 Platter’s and sent him its four star rating, along with: “First release a typical botrytis wine, from chenin blanc; deep copper colours, ripe – almost over-ripe – apricot and honey bouquet; relatively low sugar with high acid and alcohol make this intense but among the least cloying. (Alc.13%, sugar 87 gms/l, and acid an unusual 10,8 gms/l all noticeable.)” I could rest my case there.
As a wine lover, I’m interested in hearing as many opinions about wine as possible. If Tim Atkin scores the 2015 Paul Sauer 100 points, I’m interested in it. If Neal Martin them comes and scores the 2016 higher, I’m interested. Then I’m also interested to hear what Christian Eedes, Michael Fridjhon, Angela Lloyd, Tim James, Platter’s, Jancis Robinson, Abrie Beeslaar, Jamie Goode, my wine geek friends, and others say about it. And I’m extremely interested in what someone with a decent palate and experience says about it after tasting it blind. But none of these options have the required info so readily and easily at hand as Platter’s do, on such a wide variety of wines. And, from the consumer’s side, they are not competitors; I’m not going to stop reading other reviews because I have a Platter’s. And I’m not going to stop reading Platter’s because I took out a subscription to Vinous.
Sure, Platter’s need to make some changes. For starters, whoever owns it needs to care more about it. Then it needs more investment, so that the people don’t work themselves to shreds, only as a passion project. Being tasters and editors for a venture like this requires highly specialised people – pay them their dues, and get enough of them to make the workload manageable without flirting with burnout. Then, we really need the analysis of all of the wines, like the 1990 Platter’s had for the Bellingham NLH. It’s available. So just put it in the Platter’s where we have easy access. Please. Producers are notorious for either not showing it at all (or not in full) on their websites, hiding it on their websites, or losing it after a while.
And if Christian reviews a brand new release in May, it’s okay if that rating only appears in the end of that year’s Platter’s. Printed and electronic iterations of wine reviews can never be the same. They both have their pros and cons. So while I can’t see a review of a just-released range immediately in Platter’s, I can’t see a list of the varietal Petit Verdots that was available in 2019 on Christian’s website, or who made Michaella’s wines in 2017 (or find the residual sugar level of the Bellingham 1987 NLH).
If I want to spend R500+ on a Pinotage, I have a chance of finding out what Christian thinks about the Waterkloof Last of the First Pinotage but if I only want to spend R70, I’ll probably never know what Christian thinks about Waterkloof’s False Bay Bush Vine Pinotage. Luckily, a quick look in Platter’s reveals that Cathy Marston agrees about the great value of this hands-off made wine. This is nothing against Christian (he can only taste so many wines and he’s doing a fine job), it just demonstrates one of the many advantages of also having a Platter’s available.
So, kudos to Waterkloof for entering Platter’s where people can find their wines now and in the future. And for including their False Bay range, because it’ll be very tough to find reviews on these anywhere else. Some producers only enter their top ranges, because they supposedly think that the lesser ranges will drag their reputation down. Or they think nobody cares what rating a big volume wine gets. Wrong.
If you don’t offer your wines for review by Platter’s, I think you are doing yourself, the industry, and future generations of wine lovers a grave disservice. Don’t be so precious about your ratings either. If Platter’s give everything five stars, five stars will mean nothing. If you make good wine, a four and a half star vs a five star rating is not going to hurt you (or a four, instead of a four and a half). I see Alheit is still in business. But any odd high rating will sell you extra bottles and offer you valuable word-of-mouth mileage that you wouldn’t have had otherwise.
Sometimes, you only realise what you’ve lost after it’s gone. Heck, you don’t even have to pay entrance fees to get your wine in Platter’s. It only costs some wine and transport, which all wine producers fork out all the time elsewhere – often less effectively. Future generations will thank you for the legacy if the non-partaking (apathetic/scorned) ones in the industry get over themselves and enter Platter’s. That alone will make it stronger again. I worked until 03:10 this morning, so now I have put myself in trouble again by writing this. But it matters.
Alan Glass | 2 June 2026
Well said.